<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To pounce or not to pounce? That’s the question when it comes to how best to follow up with leads on your website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideaexchange.quarry.com/2009/11/to-pounce-or-not-to-pounce-that%e2%80%99s-the-key-question-when-it-comes-to-how-best-to-follow-up-with-leads-on-your-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideaexchange.quarry.com/2009/11/to-pounce-or-not-to-pounce-that%e2%80%99s-the-key-question-when-it-comes-to-how-best-to-follow-up-with-leads-on-your-website/</link>
	<description>Sharing Ideas That Build</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:57:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Ryan</title>
		<link>http://ideaexchange.quarry.com/2009/11/to-pounce-or-not-to-pounce-that%e2%80%99s-the-key-question-when-it-comes-to-how-best-to-follow-up-with-leads-on-your-website/comment-page-1/#comment-8177</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaexchange.quarry.com/?p=1302#comment-8177</guid>
		<description>Great posting Richard. Brian Carroll certainly knows his stuff. I believe that the days of effective &quot;pounce&quot; marketing are coming to an end. In the B2B environment you are better off displaying an attitude of &quot;service&quot; instead of sales. Many Web generated leads are contacted by quota-driven sales reps before they are the appropriate stage in the sales cycle. This can actually be counterproductive. Good marketers are becoming more sensitive to the buying habits of their prospects instead of simply attempting to force everyone into their established sales processes. 

Chris Ryan
www.fusionmarketingpartners.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great posting Richard. Brian Carroll certainly knows his stuff. I believe that the days of effective &#8220;pounce&#8221; marketing are coming to an end. In the B2B environment you are better off displaying an attitude of &#8220;service&#8221; instead of sales. Many Web generated leads are contacted by quota-driven sales reps before they are the appropriate stage in the sales cycle. This can actually be counterproductive. Good marketers are becoming more sensitive to the buying habits of their prospects instead of simply attempting to force everyone into their established sales&nbsp;processes. </p>
<p>Chris Ryan<br />&nbsp;<a href="http://www.fusionmarketingpartners.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fusionmarketingpartners.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samorvil</title>
		<link>http://ideaexchange.quarry.com/2009/11/to-pounce-or-not-to-pounce-that%e2%80%99s-the-key-question-when-it-comes-to-how-best-to-follow-up-with-leads-on-your-website/comment-page-1/#comment-7937</link>
		<dc:creator>samorvil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaexchange.quarry.com/?p=1302#comment-7937</guid>
		<description>Generating leads and converting it into sales are very crucial . . . there’s no exact science or formula but rather it is an art. The process we used today is very effective but in the future its not because time is changing, more thoughts and concept arise, technology, and people’s expectations too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generating leads and converting it into sales are very crucial &#8230; there’s no exact science or formula but rather it is an art. The process we used today is very effective but in the future its not because time is changing, more thoughts and concept arise, technology, and people’s expectations&nbsp;too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
